Pattern #102: Condensed Layout

Pattern #102  Tested 1 timesTested by Julian Gaviria on Apr 02, 2019

Based on 1 Tests, Members See How Likely Version B Wins Or Loses And By How Much

LOSSES
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
FLAT
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
WINS

Measured by the sum of negative and positive tests.

A B
Condensed Layout (Variant A) Condensed Layout (Variant B)

Expected Median Effects Of B

-

Progression

?

Leads

(1 tests)

-

Signups

-

Engagement

-

Sales

-

Revenue

-

Retention

-

Referrals

?

ANY PRIMARY

(1 tests)

Tests

Pattern #102: Condensed Layout
Was Tested On Thomasnet.com by Julian Gaviria

Replaced

Isolated

Test #235 on Thomasnet.com by $conducted_test->test->user_->first_name . ' ' . $conducted_test->test->user_->last_name Julian Gaviria    Apr 02, 2019 Test link

Find Out How It Did With 11,567 Visitors

  • Measured by lead form completions on next screen

In this experiment, the layout was condensed from a taller to a shorter one.

Get Access To See The Test Results

For each pattern, we measure three key data points derived from related tests:

REPEATABILITY - this is a measure of how often a given pattern has generated a positive or negative effect. The higher this number, the more likely the pattern will continue to repeat.

SHALLOW MEDIAN - this is a median effect measured with low intent actions such as initiating the first step of a lengthier process

DEEP MEDIAN - this is derived from the highest intent metrics that we have for a given test such as fully completed signups or sales.