Pattern #5: Top Aligned Labels

Pattern #5  Tested 2 timesFirst tested by Hugo Palm Recently tested by Alex James on Feb 25, 2021

Based on 2 Tests, Members See How Likely Version B Wins Or Loses And By How Much

LOSSES
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
FLAT
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
WINS

Measured by the sum of negative and positive tests.

A B
Top Aligned Labels (Variant A) Top Aligned Labels (Variant B)

Expected Median Effects Of B

-

Progression

?

Leads

(1 tests)

?

Signups

(1 tests)

-

Engagement

-

Sales

-

Revenue

-

Retention

-

Referrals

?

ANY PRIMARY

(2 tests)

Tested on

Tests

Pattern #5: Top Aligned Labels
Was Tested by Alex James

Replaced

Isolated

Test #341 Tested on An Anonymous Site    Feb 25, 2021 Test link

Find Out How It Performed With 579,148 Visitors

  • Measured by partial registrations (step 1 completions)

This experiment shows a comparison between floating-field labels vs top-aligned labels. In the control, the form labels first appeared inlineĀ and as users would begin typing, they floated to the top of the field. The variation had fixed field labels above the form fields at all times. Impact on signups was measured.

Get Access To See The Test Results

The Same Pattern Was Also Tested Here

Isolated

Test #77 on Easycredit.se by Hugo Palm    Dec 05, 2016 Test link

Find Out How It Performed With 8,292 Visitors

  • Measured by form submits

Get Access To See The Test Results

For each pattern, we measure three key data points derived from related tests:

REPEATABILITY - this is a measure of how often a given pattern has generated a positive or negative effect. The higher this number, the more likely the pattern will continue to repeat.

SHALLOW MEDIAN - this is a median effect measured with low intent actions such as initiating the first step of a lengthier process

DEEP MEDIAN - this is derived from the highest intent metrics that we have for a given test such as fully completed signups or sales.