All Latest 617 A/B Tests
MOST RECENT TESTS
Test #640 on
Obs.no
by
Joachim Furuseth
Mar 24, 2026
Desktop
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Joachim Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields On Obs.no
The control had a clickable link "Use discount code" which would reveal an input field for a coupon code. The variation removed this link and input field. Impact on purchases was measured. (Desktop only)
Which A Or B Actually Wins? Find Out Before You Test.
Members see every test result — the winners, the flat ones, and the losers — along with exact effects and sample sizes. Use it to estimate your tests and prioritize by probability, not gut feel. Start every experiment with the odds on your side.
Test #635 on
Obsbygg.no
by
Joachim Furuseth
Feb 18, 2026
Desktop
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Joachim Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields On Obsbygg.no
The control had a clickable link "Use discount code" which would reveal an input field for a coupon code. The variation removed this link and input field. Impact on purchases was measured. (Desktop only)
Test #629 on
by
Jakub Linowski
Jan 26, 2026
Desktop
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Jakub Tested Pattern #98: Auto Suggest
In this experiment (1) the zip code field position was moved up, right below the last name. And (2) entering the zip code would populate the state and city using an autofill API call. Impact on orders completed was measured.
Test #536 on
by
Jakub Linowski
Jun 14, 2024
Desktop
Mobile
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Jakub Tested Pattern #28: Easiest Fields First
In this experiment, the order of the checkout flow was rearranged. In the control the first step of the checkout flow started with the shipping information step, followed by greeting card selection. In the variation this was rearranged (hypothesis was that the greeting card step was easier). Impact on sales was measured.
Test #435 on
Volders.de
by
Daria Kurchinskaia
Oct 17, 2022
Desktop
Mobile
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Daria Tested Pattern #9: Multiple Steps On Volders.de
In this experiment, a question about a customer's reason for purchase was broken out into a separate step and moved earlier in the process. In the control, this question was asked in the final checkout step along with a plan selection (Step 4 of 4). In the variation, this question was shifted as a standalone first step (Step 1 of 5). Impact on completed purchases was measured (for a contract cancellation service in this case).
Test #427 on
Designlab.com
by
Daniel Shapiro
Aug 10, 2022
Desktop
Mobile
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Daniel Tested Pattern #28: Easiest Fields First On Designlab.com
In this experiment, the course enrollment start date was moved from step 2 to step 1 of an enrollment / checkout flow. The test was run by Designlab - that offers design courses and education with a strong element of mentorship. Impact on progression to next step and completed transactions were measured.
Test #414 on
Volders.de
by
Frederik Fröhle
May 31, 2022
Desktop
Mobile
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Frederik Tested Pattern #98: Auto Suggest On Volders.de
Does adding Google's address auto complete functionality to an address field help with higher form completions? This auto fill feature has been tested in the variation of a contract cancellation funnel. After selecting an auto completed address from a pulldown menu, the following fields were preselected: house number, zip code, city and country (potentially lowering friction?). Impact on successful form completions (contract cancellations) has been measured. Notice how the form also expanded progressively upon selecting the complete address in the variation.
Test #399 on
by
Jakub Linowski
Feb 27, 2022
Desktop
Mobile
Checkout
X.X%
Progression
Jakub Tested Pattern #35: Floating Labels
In this experiment, top-aligned field labels were tested against floating labels (with labels floating inside the form field itself).
Test #389 on
Svsound.com
by
Keenan Davis
Dec 16, 2021
Desktop
Mobile
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Keenan Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields On Svsound.com
In this simple experiment, a highly visible coupon field was replaced with a less visible (but clickable) link in the variation. Clicking on the link would show the coupon field. Impact on sales and revenue was measured.
Test #383 on
by
Jakub Linowski
Nov 11, 2021
Desktop
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Jakub Tested Pattern #123: Single Or Double Column Form Fields
In this simple [inverted] experiment, the variation organized the form fields into a single column. The control had two columns of form fields.
Test #274 on
by
Someone
Dec 16, 2019
Desktop
Mobile
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Someone Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields
In this experiment, a fully visible coupon field (A) was made less visible by turning it into a default collaped link (B). Clicking on the link caused the coupon field to appear.
Test #145 on
Normanrecords.com
by
Nathon Raine
Jan 18, 2018
Desktop
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Nathon Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields On Normanrecords.com
In this test the coupon field was replaced with a small link that would bring the field back if needed. This is a more suble approach than just completely removing the coupon field. It still allows for the use of coupon fields by those customers which are truly searching for a way to enter their aquired codes.
Test #57 on
by
Jakub Linowski
Jul 07, 2016
Desktop
Checkout
X.X%
Sales
Jakub Tested Pattern #66: Complementary Upsell