Pattern #78: Structured Tags

Pattern Author: Kimberly Cheung - Product Manager at Yummly

Based on 2 Tests, Members See How Likely This Pattern Will Win Or Lose And Its (?) Median Effect

Almost Certain Loser
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
Almost Certain Winner
Structured Tags

  1. Visible Tags Explaining

    This pattern asks the questions whether to show or hide metadata, tags or descriptors for each listing or tile card. 

Median Effects

?

Engagement

Ex: Any Action / Visit

(2 tests)

?

Conversions

Ex: Signups, Leads

(2 tests)

?

Sales

Ex: Transactions, Upsells

?

Revenue

Ex: AOV, LTV

?

Retention

Ex: Return Visits

?

Referrals

Ex: Social Shares

Tests

Pattern #78: Structured Tags
Was Tested On Yummly.com by Kimberly Cheung

Test #195 Tested on Yummly.com by Kimberly Cheung Kimberly Aug 13, 2018

Find Out How It Performed With 371,274 Visitors

Listing Desktop, Mobile

  • Measured by clicks on a card and visits recipe   |   p-val (?)

  • Measured by full registrations   |   p-val (?)

Zoom In
  • (?)% ((?) successes out of (?) visits)
  • (?)% ((?) successes out of (?) visits)
A
  • (?)% ((?) successes out of (?) visits)
  • (?)% ((?) successes out of (?) visits)
B

Get Access To See The Test Results

The Same Pattern Was Also Tested Here

Test #284 Tested on Thomasnet.com by Julian Gaviria Julian Feb 19, 2020

Find Out How It Performed With 241,428 Visitors

Listing Desktop, Mobile

  • Measured by company listing views   |   p-val (?)

  • Measured by company contact (RFI)   |   p-val (?)

Zoom In
  • (?)% ((?) successes out of (?) visits)
  • (?)% ((?) successes out of (?) visits)
A
  • (?)% ((?) successes out of (?) visits)
  • (?)% ((?) successes out of (?) visits)
B

In this experiment, structured data tags were displayed on a listing page to help potential buyers make better decisions. The additional information about the listed companies included: annual revenue, employee count, and year of establishment.

Get Access To See The Test Results

For each pattern, we measure three key data points derived from related tests:

REPEATABILITY - this is a measure of how often a given pattern has generated a positive or negative effect. The higher this number, the more likely the pattern will continue to repeat.

SHALLOW MEDIAN - this is a median effect measured with low intent actions such as initiating the first step of a lengthier process

DEEP MEDIAN - this is derived from the highest intent metrics that we have for a given test such as fully completed signups or sales.