All Latest 620 A/B Tests

MOST RECENT TESTS

Test #277 on Prepagent.com by Arthur SparksArthur Sparks Jan 03, 2020 Desktop Pricing X.X% Revenue

Arthur Tested Pattern #115: Pricing Comparison Table On Prepagent.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In this experiment, side-by-side plan features were aligned and changed to a comparison table with checkmarks for easier comparison.

Which A Or B Actually Wins? Find Out Before You Test.

Members see every test result — the winners, the flat ones, and the losers — along with exact effects and sample sizes. Use it to estimate your tests and prioritize by probability, not gut feel. Start every experiment with the odds on your side.

Test #275 on Prepagent.com by Arthur SparksArthur Sparks Dec 31, 2019 Desktop Pricing X.X% Revenue

Arthur Tested Pattern #114: Less Or More Visible Prices On Prepagent.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In this experiment, all three prices of each plan were shifted higher for greater visibility.

Test #272 on Backstage.com by Stanley ZuoStanley Zuo Dec 03, 2019 Desktop Pricing X.X% Revenue

Stanley Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans On Backstage.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In this experiment, the three pricing plans were condensed into a single recommended plan (annual), with a secondary option to choose the monthly plan.

Test #254 on Volders.de by Alexander KriegerAlexander Krieger Aug 16, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup X.X% Revenue

Alexander Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Volders.de

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In this experiment, 4 things were adjusted in the variation: the highest pricing plan was shifted to the left, it was set as the default one, the recommendation was also adjusted to point to the highest plan, and one benefit from the lowest plan was removed (customer support).

Test #253 on Volders.de by Alexander KriegerAlexander Krieger Aug 08, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup X.X% Revenue

Alexander Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Volders.de

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In this experiment, two pricing plans were inverted to show the most expensive plan first (in the variation).

Test #223 on Volders.de by Alexander KriegerAlexander Krieger Feb 01, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup X.X% Revenue

Alexander Tested Pattern #12: Payment First On Volders.de

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

This test deprioritized the free option (kostenlos) of cancelling a contract. It did so by placing it under the paid options as small text link / radio option.

Test #133 on Bing.com by Ronny KohaviRonny Kohavi Dec 13, 2017 Desktop Mobile Listing X.X% Revenue

Ronny Tested Pattern #43: Long Titles On Bing.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In 2012 a Microsoft employee working on Bing had an idea about changing the way the search engine displayed ad headlines. Developing it wouldn’t require much effort—just a few days of an engineer’s time—but it was one of hundreds of ideas proposed, and the program managers deemed it a low priority. So it languished for more than six months, until an engineer, who saw that the cost of writing the code for it would be small, launched a simple online controlled experiment—an A/B test—to assess its impact. Within hours the new headline variation was producing abnormally high revenue, triggering a “too good to be true” alert.

HBR, September–October 2017 Issue, https://hbr.org/2017/09/the-surprising-power-of-online-experiments

Note: This experiment was a solid success and replicated multiple times over a period of months. It worked at Bing and had a profound influence. The only reason why we atributed a 0.25 point (a "Maybe") was because we don't have the exact sample size and conversion data.

 

Test #130 on Kenhub.com by Niels HapkeNiels Hapke Dec 07, 2017 Desktop Pricing X.X% Revenue

Niels Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Kenhub.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In this experiment, the plans were sorted by the most expensive first, left to right (variation).

Test #70 on Uptowork.com by Kuba KoziejKuba Koziej Nov 01, 2016 Desktop Pricing X.X% Revenue

Kuba Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Uptowork.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

This test simply ordered the pricing plans from highest to most expensive. Overall sales decreased by an insignificant -1% with a possible +14% increase to the most expensive plan. The net effect was an insignificant 0.9% increase the the premium plans.

Test #129 on Barackobama.com by Kyle RushKyle Rush Jun 01, 2012 Desktop Checkout X.X% Revenue

Kyle Tested Pattern #9: Multiple Steps On Barackobama.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

Kyle's team changed a donation form for the Barack Obama 2012 campaign from a single step to a 4 step one. The 4 steps were: amount, personal information, billing information and occupation/employer.

"Our plan was to separate the field groups into four smaller steps so that users did not feel overwhelmed by the length of the form." - Kyle Rush