All Latest 620 A/B Tests
MOST RECENT TESTS
Test #504 on
Volders.de
by Michal Fiech
Nov 17, 2023
Desktop
Mobile
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Michal Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans On Volders.de
In this experiment, the cheapest pricing plan was removed from a set of 2 options. This only left the most expensive pricing plan as the option. Impact on sales and revenue was measured.
Which A Or B Actually Wins? Find Out Before You Test.
Members see every test result — the winners, the flat ones, and the losers — along with exact effects and sample sizes. Use it to estimate your tests and prioritize by probability, not gut feel. Start every experiment with the odds on your side.
Test #431 on
Volders.de
by
Daria Kurchinskaia
Sep 23, 2022
Desktop
Mobile
Pricing
X.X%
Sales
Daria Tested Pattern #21: What It's Worth On Volders.de
In this experiment, a historically higher price point was added as a crossed out anchor. The control only showed the current price. The variation showed the current price with the higher price crossed out. Impact on sales was measured.
Test #386 on
Learnwithhomer.com
by
Stanley Zuo
Nov 29, 2021
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Sales
Stanley Tested Pattern #112: Lower Price Frames On Learnwithhomer.com
In this experiment, the annual plan was standardized and framed in a monthly price context (during the iOS signup flow). This made the annual plan more comparable to the monthly plan price. Impact on overall sales and annual plan sales was measured.
Test #379 on
Learnwithhomer.com
by
Stanley Zuo
Oct 15, 2021
Mobile
Pricing
X.X%
Sales
Stanley Tested Pattern #112: Lower Price Frames On Learnwithhomer.com
In this experiment, the annual plan was standardized and framed in a monthly price context. This was more comparable with the monthly plan price above. Please also note that the annual billing price was also kept and clearly stated. Impact on overall sales and annual plan sales was measured.
Test #357 on
Baremetrics.com
by
Brian Sierakowski
Jun 02, 2021
Desktop
Mobile
Pricing
X.X%
Signups
Brian Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans On Baremetrics.com
In this experiment, a single focus signup was transformed into a pricing comparison table. Impact on signups was measured.
Test #319 on
Backstage.com
by
Stanley Zuo
Sep 30, 2020
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Stanley Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans On Backstage.com
In this experiment, a 3 plan vs 2 plan pricing page was shown to potential customers. Impact on sales and revenue were measured.
Test #306 on
Backstage.com
by
Stanley Zuo
Jul 09, 2020
Desktop
Mobile
Pricing
X.X%
Sales
Stanley Tested Pattern #69: Autodiscounting On Backstage.com
In this experiment, the only change was an added message at the top of the pricing screen, clarifying that there is an active discount on a yearly plan. The discount was already communicated with a strike-through price on the control version as well. The variation simply emphasized this aggressively.
Test #289 on
Prepagent.com
by
Arthur Sparks
Mar 23, 2020
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Arthur Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, the order of pricing plans was rearranged as to show the most expensive one first.
Test #275 on
Prepagent.com
by
Arthur Sparks
Dec 31, 2019
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Arthur Tested Pattern #114: Less Or More Visible Prices On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, all three prices of each plan were shifted higher for greater visibility.
Test #272 on
Backstage.com
by
Stanley Zuo
Dec 03, 2019
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Stanley Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans On Backstage.com
In this experiment, the three pricing plans were condensed into a single recommended plan (annual), with a secondary option to choose the monthly plan.
Test #265 on
Poll-app.com
by
Pierre Olivier Martel
Oct 17, 2019
Desktop
Mobile
Pricing
X.X%
Sales
Pierre Olivier Tested Pattern #112: Lower Price Frames On Poll-app.com
In this experiment, the $69 payment was explained as $6 per month over 1 year, and the $89 was explained as $4 per month over 2 years.
Test #130 on
Kenhub.com
by
Niels Hapke
Dec 07, 2017
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Niels Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Kenhub.com
In this experiment, the plans were sorted by the most expensive first, left to right (variation).
Test #70 on
Uptowork.com
by
Kuba Koziej
Nov 01, 2016
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Kuba Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Uptowork.com
This test simply ordered the pricing plans from highest to most expensive. Overall sales decreased by an insignificant -1% with a possible +14% increase to the most expensive plan. The net effect was an insignificant 0.9% increase the the premium plans.
Test #2 on
Wpallimport.com
by
Louis Reingold
Jan 01, 2016
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Sales
Louis Tested Pattern #21: What It's Worth On Wpallimport.com