All Latest 650 A/B Tests
Test #396
on Depositphotos.com
by
Gleb Hodorovskiy
Feb 13, 2022
Desktop
Listing
X.X%
Revenue
Gleb Tested Pattern #124: Confirmed Selection On Depositphotos.com
In this experiment from Conversionrate.store, the framing of the registration message was changed from a generic account creation one to a specific image selected by the user. The experiment started on a listing page of a stock photography / illustration site. The control showed a more generic message with benefits for signing up and making the purchase. Whereas the variation repeated the actual image that customers clicked on from listing pages - establishing continuity as well as providing a reason for signing up. Impact on sales was measured.
Which A Or B Actually Wins? Find Out Before You Test.
Members see every test result — the winners, the flat ones, and the losers — along with exact effects and sample sizes. Use it to estimate your tests and prioritize by probability, not gut feel. Start every experiment with the odds on your side.
Test #389
on Svsound.com
by
Keenan Davis
Dec 16, 2021
Desktop
Mobile
Checkout
X.X%
Revenue
Keenan Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields On Svsound.com
In this simple experiment, a highly visible coupon field was replaced with a less visible (but clickable) link in the variation. Clicking on the link would show the coupon field. Impact on sales and revenue was measured.
Test #354
on Mvideo.ru
by
Andrey Andreev
May 25, 2021
Desktop
Mobile
Product
X.X%
Revenue
Andrey Tested Pattern #69: Autodiscounting On Mvideo.ru
In this experiment, the discounted price was shown along with an active promotion. The control only showed that the relative -8% discount was present with the pre-discounted price.
Test #324
by
Jakub Linowski
Oct 30, 2020
Desktop
Mobile
Product
X.X%
Revenue
Jakub Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First
This experiment tested the order of purchase plans. The control version sorted the purchase options by the least expensive while the variation sorted them by the most expensive first. Impact on sales and revenue was measured.
Test #319
on Backstage.com
by
Stanley Zuo
Sep 30, 2020
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Stanley Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans On Backstage.com
In this experiment, a 3 plan vs 2 plan pricing page was shown to potential customers. Impact on sales and revenue were measured.
Test #289
on Prepagent.com
by
Arthur Sparks
Mar 23, 2020
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Arthur Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, the order of pricing plans was rearranged as to show the most expensive one first.
Test #277
on Prepagent.com
by
Arthur Sparks
Jan 03, 2020
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Arthur Tested Pattern #115: Pricing Comparison Table On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, side-by-side plan features were aligned and changed to a comparison table with checkmarks for easier comparison.
Test #275
on Prepagent.com
by
Arthur Sparks
Dec 31, 2019
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Arthur Tested Pattern #114: Less Or More Visible Prices On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, all three prices of each plan were shifted higher for greater visibility.
Test #272
on Backstage.com
by
Stanley Zuo
Dec 03, 2019
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Stanley Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans On Backstage.com
In this experiment, the three pricing plans were condensed into a single recommended plan (annual), with a secondary option to choose the monthly plan.
Test #254
on Volders.de
by
Alexander Krieger
Aug 16, 2019
Desktop
Mobile
Signup
X.X%
Revenue
Alexander Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Volders.de
In this experiment, 4 things were adjusted in the variation: the highest pricing plan was shifted to the left, it was set as the default one, the recommendation was also adjusted to point to the highest plan, and one benefit from the lowest plan was removed (customer support).
Test #253
on Volders.de
by
Alexander Krieger
Aug 08, 2019
Desktop
Mobile
Signup
X.X%
Revenue
Alexander Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Volders.de
In this experiment, two pricing plans were inverted to show the most expensive plan first (in the variation).
Test #223
on Volders.de
by
Alexander Krieger
Feb 01, 2019
Desktop
Mobile
Signup
X.X%
Revenue
Alexander Tested Pattern #12: Payment First On Volders.de
This test deprioritized the free option (kostenlos) of cancelling a contract. It did so by placing it under the paid options as small text link / radio option.
Test #177
by
Devesh Khanal
May 17, 2018
Desktop
Shopping Cart
X.X%
Revenue
Devesh Tested Pattern #66: Complementary Upsell
Test #163
on Lovehoney.co.uk
by
Matthew Curry
Mar 27, 2018
Mobile
Desktop
Product
X.X%
Revenue
Matthew Tested Pattern #62: Urgent Next Day Delivery On Lovehoney.co.uk
Test #133
on Bing.com
by
Ronny Kohavi
Dec 13, 2017
Desktop
Mobile
Listing
X.X%
Revenue
Ronny Tested Pattern #43: Long Titles On Bing.com
In 2012 a Microsoft employee working on Bing had an idea about changing the way the search engine displayed ad headlines. Developing it wouldn’t require much effort—just a few days of an engineer’s time—but it was one of hundreds of ideas proposed, and the program managers deemed it a low priority. So it languished for more than six months, until an engineer, who saw that the cost of writing the code for it would be small, launched a simple online controlled experiment—an A/B test—to assess its impact. Within hours the new headline variation was producing abnormally high revenue, triggering a “too good to be true” alert.
HBR, September–October 2017 Issue, https://hbr.org/2017/09/the-surprising-power-of-online-experiments
Note: This experiment was a solid success and replicated multiple times over a period of months. It worked at Bing and had a profound influence. The only reason why we atributed a 0.25 point (a "Maybe") was because we don't have the exact sample size and conversion data.
Test #130
on Kenhub.com
by
Niels Hapke
Dec 07, 2017
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Niels Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Kenhub.com
In this experiment, the plans were sorted by the most expensive first, left to right (variation).
Test #70
on Uptowork.com
by
Kuba Koziej
Nov 01, 2016
Desktop
Pricing
X.X%
Revenue
Kuba Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Uptowork.com
This test simply ordered the pricing plans from highest to most expensive. Overall sales decreased by an insignificant -1% with a possible +14% increase to the most expensive plan. The net effect was an insignificant 0.9% increase the the premium plans.
Test #121
on Bionicgloves.com
by
VWO
Mar 13, 2015
Shopping Cart
X.X%
Revenue
VWO Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields On Bionicgloves.com
VWO.com published this test which removed two coupon fields on a shopping cart: a gift card code and a special offer code.
Test #129
on Barackobama.com
by
Kyle Rush
Jun 01, 2012
Desktop
Checkout
X.X%
Revenue
Kyle Tested Pattern #9: Multiple Steps On Barackobama.com
Kyle's team changed a donation form for the Barack Obama 2012 campaign from a single step to a 4 step one. The 4 steps were: amount, personal information, billing information and occupation/employer.
"Our plan was to separate the field groups into four smaller steps so that users did not feel overwhelmed by the length of the form." - Kyle Rush