Your filter results
Become a member to unlock the abiltiy to see the highest impact a/b tests. Being able to see the actual test results and sort by impact allows growth and experimentation teams to take action on the biggest gains first
Test #324 on by Jakub Linowski Oct 30, 2020 Desktop Mobile Product
Jakub Linowski Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #324
This experiment tested the order of purchase plans. The control version sorted the purchase options by the least expensive while the variation sorted them by the most expensive first. Impact on sales and revenue was measured.
Test #319 on Backstage.com by Stanley Zuo Sep 30, 2020 Desktop Pricing
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans In Test #319 On Backstage.com
In this experiment, a 3 plan vs 2 plan pricing page was shown to potential customers. Impact on sales and revenue were measured.
Test #289 on Prepagent.com by Arthur Sparks Mar 23, 2020 Desktop Pricing
Arthur Sparks Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #289 On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, the order of pricing plans was rearranged as to show the most expensive one first.
Test #277 on Prepagent.com by Arthur Sparks Jan 03, 2020 Desktop Pricing
Arthur Sparks Tested Pattern #115: Pricing Comparison Table In Test #277 On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, side-by-side plan features were aligned and changed to a comparison table with checkmarks for easier comparison.
Test #275 on Prepagent.com by Arthur Sparks Dec 31, 2019 Desktop Pricing
Arthur Sparks Tested Pattern #114: Less Or More Visible Prices In Test #275 On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, all three prices of each plan were shifted higher for greater visibility.
Test #272 on Backstage.com by Stanley Zuo Dec 03, 2019 Desktop Pricing
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans In Test #272 On Backstage.com
In this experiment, the three pricing plans were condensed into a single recommended plan (annual), with a secondary option to choose the monthly plan.
Test #254 on Volders.de by Alexander Krieger Aug 16, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup
Alexander Krieger Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #254 On Volders.de
In this experiment, 4 things were adjusted in the variation: the highest pricing plan was shifted to the left, it was set as the default one, the recommendation was also adjusted to point to the highest plan, and one benefit from the lowest plan was removed (customer support).
Test #253 on Volders.de by Alexander Krieger Aug 08, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup
Alexander Krieger Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #253 On Volders.de
In this experiment, two pricing plans were inverted to show the most expensive plan first (in the variation).
Test #223 on Volders.de by Alexander Krieger Feb 01, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup
Alexander Krieger Tested Pattern #12: Payment First In Test #223 On Volders.de
This test deprioritized the free option (kostenlos) of cancelling a contract. It did so by placing it under the paid options as small text link / radio option.
Test #177 on by Devesh Khanal May 17, 2018 Desktop Shopping Cart
Devesh Khanal Tested Pattern #66: Complementary Upsell In Test #177
Test #163 on Lovehoney.co.uk by Matthew Curry Mar 27, 2018 Mobile Desktop Product
Matthew Curry Tested Pattern #62: Urgent Next Day Delivery In Test #163 On Lovehoney.co.uk
Test #133 on Bing.com by Ronny Kohavi Dec 13, 2017 Desktop Mobile Listing
Ronny Kohavi Tested Pattern #43: Long Titles In Test #133 On Bing.com
In 2012 a Microsoft employee working on Bing had an idea about changing the way the search engine displayed ad headlines. Developing it wouldn’t require much effort—just a few days of an engineer’s time—but it was one of hundreds of ideas proposed, and the program managers deemed it a low priority. So it languished for more than six months, until an engineer, who saw that the cost of writing the code for it would be small, launched a simple online controlled experiment—an A/B test—to assess its impact. Within hours the new headline variation was producing abnormally high revenue, triggering a “too good to be true” alert.
HBR, September–October 2017 Issue, https://hbr.org/2017/09/the-surprising-power-of-online-experiments
Note: This experiment was a solid success and replicated multiple times over a period of months. It worked at Bing and had a profound influence. The only reason why we atributed a 0.25 point (a "Maybe") was because we don't have the exact sample size and conversion data.
Test #130 on Kenhub.com by Niels Hapke Dec 07, 2017 Desktop Pricing
Niels Hapke Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #130 On Kenhub.com
In this experiment, the plans were sorted by the most expensive first, left to right (variation).
Test #70 on Uptowork.com by Kuba Koziej Nov 01, 2016 Desktop Pricing
Kuba Koziej Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #70 On Uptowork.com
This test simply ordered the pricing plans from highest to most expensive. Overall sales decreased by an insignificant -1% with a possible +14% increase to the most expensive plan. The net effect was an insignificant 0.9% increase the the premium plans.
Test #121 on Bionicgloves.com by VWO Mar 13, 2015 Shopping Cart
VWO Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields In Test #121 On Bionicgloves.com
VWO.com published this test which removed two coupon fields on a shopping cart: a gift card code and a special offer code.
Test #129 on Barackobama.com by Kyle Rush Jun 01, 2012 Desktop Checkout
Kyle Rush Tested Pattern #9: Multiple Steps In Test #129 On Barackobama.com
Kyle's team changed a donation form for the Barack Obama 2012 campaign from a single step to a 4 step one. The 4 steps were: amount, personal information, billing information and occupation/employer.
"Our plan was to separate the field groups into four smaller steps so that users did not feel overwhelmed by the length of the form." - Kyle Rush