All Latest 615 A/B Tests

MOST RECENT TESTS

Test #272 on Backstage.com by Stanley ZuoStanley Zuo Dec 03, 2019 Desktop Pricing X.X% Revenue

Stanley Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans On Backstage.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In this experiment, the three pricing plans were condensed into a single recommended plan (annual), with a secondary option to choose the monthly plan.

Which A Or B Actually Wins? Find Out Before You Test.

Members see every test result — the winners, the flat ones, and the losers — along with exact effects and sample sizes. Use it to estimate your tests and prioritize by probability, not gut feel. Start every experiment with the odds on your side.

Test #265 on Poll-app.com by Pierre Olivier MartelPierre Olivier Martel Oct 17, 2019 Desktop Mobile Pricing X.X% Sales

Pierre Olivier Tested Pattern #112: Lower Price Frames On Poll-app.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In this experiment, the $69 payment was explained as $6 per month over 1 year, and the $89 was explained as $4 per month over 2 years. 

Test #254 on Volders.de by Alexander KriegerAlexander Krieger Aug 16, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup X.X% Revenue

Alexander Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Volders.de

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In this experiment, 4 things were adjusted in the variation: the highest pricing plan was shifted to the left, it was set as the default one, the recommendation was also adjusted to point to the highest plan, and one benefit from the lowest plan was removed (customer support).

Test #253 on Volders.de by Alexander KriegerAlexander Krieger Aug 08, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup X.X% Revenue

Alexander Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Volders.de

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In this experiment, two pricing plans were inverted to show the most expensive plan first (in the variation).

Test #223 on Volders.de by Alexander KriegerAlexander Krieger Feb 01, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup X.X% Revenue

Alexander Tested Pattern #12: Payment First On Volders.de

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

This test deprioritized the free option (kostenlos) of cancelling a contract. It did so by placing it under the paid options as small text link / radio option.

Test #167 on Lovehoney.co.uk by Matthew CurryMatthew Curry Apr 10, 2018 Desktop Product X.X% Sales

Matthew Tested Pattern #69: Autodiscounting On Lovehoney.co.uk

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

The idea is that, if the customer has an active discount code for that session (either by landing on a particular page, or entering a code somewhere), instead of just showing the discount in the basket, we show it further (earlier) up the funnel and automatically discount on the product page.

The effectiveness of this depends on the discount level, I've tested it at 30% and 50%.

With a 50% Discount:
Add to Cart rate +33%
Sales rate + 24%

With a 30% Discount:
Add to Cart rate +11.6%
Sales rate + 10.2%

Test #166 on Olark.com by Sunir ShahSunir Shah Apr 05, 2018 Desktop Mobile Home & Landing X.X% Sales

Sunir Tested Pattern #12: Payment First On Olark.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

Olark's homepage was directing users towards a free forever trial - with followup nudges to upgrade some days later. The variation B of the experiment tested a more aggressive push to a pricing page page - with options to select a paid plan, as well as provide a credit card (getting the payment conversation out of the way sooner).

Test #130 on Kenhub.com by Niels HapkeNiels Hapke Dec 07, 2017 Desktop Pricing X.X% Revenue

Niels Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Kenhub.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

In this experiment, the plans were sorted by the most expensive first, left to right (variation).

Test #70 on Uptowork.com by Kuba KoziejKuba Koziej Nov 01, 2016 Desktop Pricing X.X% Revenue

Kuba Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First On Uptowork.com

 - Variant A
 - Variant B

This test simply ordered the pricing plans from highest to most expensive. Overall sales decreased by an insignificant -1% with a possible +14% increase to the most expensive plan. The net effect was an insignificant 0.9% increase the the premium plans.