All Latest 534 A/B Tests
Become a member to unlock the abiltiy to see the highest impact a/b tests. Being able to see the actual test results and sort by impact allows growth and experimentation teams to take action on the biggest gains first
MOST RECENT TESTS
Test #394 on Chaos.com by Velin Penev Jan 29, 2022 Desktop Product
Velin Penev Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans In Test #394 On Chaos.com
In this experiment, a two plan pricing plan (standalone product with a higher collection set) was tested against a single plan one (only a collection set). Impact on clicks and total sales was measured.
Test #393 on Snocks.com by Melina Hess Jan 19, 2022 Mobile Shopping Cart
Melina Hess Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields In Test #393 On Snocks.com
This experiment replaced a visible coupon field with a dynamic text link that would initially hide the form field. Only after clicking the text link would the coupon form field appear. The translation from German is "Do you have a coupon code? Click here to apply". Impact on completed transactions was measured.
Test #386 on Learnwithhomer.com by Stanley Zuo Nov 29, 2021 Desktop Pricing
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #112: Lower Price Frames In Test #386 On Learnwithhomer.com
In this experiment, the annual plan was standardized and framed in a monthly price context (during the iOS signup flow). This made the annual plan more comparable to the monthly plan price. Impact on overall sales and annual plan sales was measured.
Test #379 on Learnwithhomer.com by Stanley Zuo Oct 15, 2021 Mobile Pricing
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #112: Lower Price Frames In Test #379 On Learnwithhomer.com
In this experiment, the annual plan was standardized and framed in a monthly price context. This was more comparable with the monthly plan price above. Please also note that the annual billing price was also kept and clearly stated. Impact on overall sales and annual plan sales was measured.
Test #361 on Chaosgroup.com by Velin Penev Jun 22, 2021 Desktop Product
Velin Penev Tested Pattern #49: Above The Fold Call To Action In Test #361 On Chaosgroup.com
In this experiment, a pricing plan selector was shifted from the very bottom of a long product page towards (almost) the top. Impact on any transactions or sales was measured.
Test #357 on Baremetrics.com by Brian Sierakowski Jun 02, 2021 Desktop Mobile Pricing
Brian Sierakowski Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans In Test #357 On Baremetrics.com
In this experiment, a single focus signup was transformed into a pricing comparison table. Impact on signups was measured.
Test #340 on by Jakub Linowski Feb 25, 2021 Desktop Checkout
Jakub Linowski Tested Pattern #114: Less Or More Visible Prices In Test #340
In this experiment, the variation added a second total price at the bottom of the checkout screen just above the checkout button. The impact on sales was measured.
Test #324 on by Jakub Linowski Oct 30, 2020 Desktop Mobile Product
Jakub Linowski Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #324
This experiment tested the order of purchase plans. The control version sorted the purchase options by the least expensive while the variation sorted them by the most expensive first. Impact on sales and revenue was measured.
Test #319 on Backstage.com by Stanley Zuo Sep 30, 2020 Desktop Pricing
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans In Test #319 On Backstage.com
In this experiment, a 3 plan vs 2 plan pricing page was shown to potential customers. Impact on sales and revenue were measured.
Test #306 on Backstage.com by Stanley Zuo Jul 09, 2020 Desktop Mobile Pricing
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #69: Autodiscounting In Test #306 On Backstage.com
In this experiment, the only change was an added message at the top of the pricing screen, clarifying that there is an active discount on a yearly plan. The discount was already communicated with a strike-through price on the control version as well. The variation simply emphasized this aggressively.
Test #301 on Zapimoveis.com.br by Vinicius Barros Peixoto May 31, 2020 Desktop Mobile Product
Vinicius Barros Peixoto Tested Pattern #21: What It's Worth In Test #301 On Zapimoveis.com.br
In this experiment, the B variation property prices were framed using higher and crossed out price points from 12 months ago - achieving a relative discount. A tooltip was also shown which explained the higher price point on hover. The example in the screenshot translates to "2% less compared to 12 months ago". This high-power experiment measured the number of leads that were generated on property (product) screens.
Test #293 on Backstage.com by Stanley Zuo Apr 14, 2020 Desktop Mobile Product
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #114: Less Or More Visible Prices In Test #293 On Backstage.com
In this experiment on a casting call site, pricing information was shown beside the application button. This change shows the effect of setting a price expectation and being more clear that the application process is not free.
Test #292 on Backstage.com by Stanley Zuo Apr 13, 2020 Desktop Mobile Listing
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #24: Visible Availability In Test #292 On Backstage.com
The core hypothesis of this experiment was that by showing clear availabiltiy (in green text) beside each casting call, more users would apply and become premium members. The experiment reports on two metrics: application starts (the first progression metric), and premium membership sales (merasured a few steps further in the funnel).
Test #289 on Prepagent.com by Arthur Sparks Mar 23, 2020 Desktop Pricing
Arthur Sparks Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #289 On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, the order of pricing plans was rearranged as to show the most expensive one first.
Test #275 on Prepagent.com by Arthur Sparks Dec 31, 2019 Desktop Pricing
Arthur Sparks Tested Pattern #114: Less Or More Visible Prices In Test #275 On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, all three prices of each plan were shifted higher for greater visibility.
Test #272 on Backstage.com by Stanley Zuo Dec 03, 2019 Desktop Pricing
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #113: More Or Fewer Plans In Test #272 On Backstage.com
In this experiment, the three pricing plans were condensed into a single recommended plan (annual), with a secondary option to choose the monthly plan.
Test #265 on Poll-app.com by Pierre Olivier Martel Oct 17, 2019 Desktop Mobile Pricing
Pierre Olivier Martel Tested Pattern #112: Lower Price Frames In Test #265 On Poll-app.com
In this experiment, the $69 payment was explained as $6 per month over 1 year, and the $89 was explained as $4 per month over 2 years.
Test #254 on Volders.de by Alexander Krieger Aug 16, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup
Alexander Krieger Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #254 On Volders.de
In this experiment, 4 things were adjusted in the variation: the highest pricing plan was shifted to the left, it was set as the default one, the recommendation was also adjusted to point to the highest plan, and one benefit from the lowest plan was removed (customer support).
Test #253 on Volders.de by Alexander Krieger Aug 08, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup
Alexander Krieger Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #253 On Volders.de
In this experiment, two pricing plans were inverted to show the most expensive plan first (in the variation).
Test #223 on Volders.de by Alexander Krieger Feb 01, 2019 Desktop Mobile Signup
Alexander Krieger Tested Pattern #12: Payment First In Test #223 On Volders.de
This test deprioritized the free option (kostenlos) of cancelling a contract. It did so by placing it under the paid options as small text link / radio option.