All Latest 615 A/B Tests

This is a heavily confounded multi-change experiment. In the variation, product choices on product detail pages were taken off and moved to a 2nd step (a new step). This also resulted in the price and primary button becoming more visible from an upward position shift. Impact on adds-to-cart and lead generation was measured.

In this experiment, a video testimonial was added mid page onto a signup / lead form page.

In this experiment, three video testimonials were added mid page onto a signup / lead form page.

In this experiment, copy was added which showed the number of experts (in a given category) a person may gain access to after filling out a lead form. The context of this is a lead-gen landing page where people are seeking experts for legal purposes. Impact on initial progression (of a multi step form) and completed leads was measured.

In this experiment, supporting university logos were appended near the primary call to action for additional credibility. These logos were placed around the middle of long landing pages on Expert Institute's web site (where experts for legal advice are searched). Impact on total leads was measured.

In this experiment, the B variation showed the relative discount in price from within the most recent 12 months as a percentage point. A tooltip was also shown which explained this message on hover. 

In this experiment, an additional call to action (Whatsapp link) was added on a listing page of one of Brazil's largest real estate sites.In the variation the 3 calls to action include: a link that launched the phone interaction, a general contact lead form, and finally the Whatsapp link (added in the variant).  Impact on total lead starts and completions was measured.

In this experiment, five clickable feature elements were surfaced on the homepage. Clicking on any of these 5 elements launched an Instastory-like short 10 second video in full screen. These videos explained the key features of the software being offered. Impact on lead generation was measured.

This was a larger leap experiment with numerous changes to the header part of a design program landing page. One of the key changes however was a shift from a single to multiple call to actions for lead generation. In the control, all potential leads would first funnel through a single syllabus download flow. In the variation, users were given three visible choices: download syllabus, webinar signup and/or book a live call with admissions. Impact on overall generated leads was measured, as well as paid enrollments.

In this experiment, an additional and alternative text based call to action link was added on real estate properity listings. Instead of only having "Ligar" ("Call"), "Enviar mensagem" was also appended ("Send Message"). This additional link lead to a lead-gen form. 

In this experiment, the addition of a secondary CTA for lead generation in the nav and the hero were tested. The additional button invited users to watch a gated demo video (approx 12 minutes). Clicking the CTA triggered a pop-up form collecting some basic contact information before the user could access the video page. Total leads were measured with lead form submittions. 

In this experiment, social proof and scarcity messages were shown on a course enrollment landing page. When students were starting to sign up at the beginning of each month (with greater availability), a simpler "X students have already enrolled in the next cohort" message was used.

Later in the month when fewer spots were available, a more scarce message was used with the following copy "ONLY X SPOTS available in the next cohort".

In both cases, the numbers were accurate and dynamically updated.

In this experiment a dynamic canned response was added to a lead form. The contents of the copy reflected a handful of user choices from other form field selections. Impact on leads / form submissions was measured.

In this experiment, a single step popup modal was tested against a 4 step sign up funnel. Users entered the experiment on the homepage and the behavior of the two buttons, book a demo and get a quote, was adjusted. Impact on leads was measured.

In this experiment, an "optional" label was shown near a message form field. Impact on overall leads was measured (requesting experts).

In this experiment, pricing plans were laid out horizontally for easier comparison. In the variation, most of the plan benefits, features and differences were also referenced using a single lable that was left-aligned. The idea was to make the variables aligned and therefore more comparable.

This pricing table appeared at the bottom of a long design program landing page. Impact on leads and applications was measured.

In this experiment, copy was added which communicated that students signing up for a course would receive extra design resources (the lead magnet). This was added in multiple states of the course page. Impact on lead generation and enrollment was measured.

In this experiment, the copy of an input textarea on a lead form was used to summarize a user's choices. Instead of showing using a generic "Message" statement, the variation use the following formula: "I'm a [Lead Type] located in [State] looking for [Expert Type]. Looking forward to hearing from you today. Thank You." Impact of leads was measured.

In this experiment, the button width was extended to the full width of the form above. Impact on leads was measured.