All Latest 550 A/B Tests
Become a member to unlock the abiltiy to see the highest impact a/b tests. Being able to see the actual test results and sort by impact allows growth and experimentation teams to take action on the biggest gains first
MOST RECENT TESTS
Test #179 on
Yummly.com
by
Marcos Ciarrocchi
May 18, 2018
Desktop
Listing
Marcos Ciarrocchi Tested Pattern #13: Centered Forms & Buttons In Test #179 On Yummly.com
Test #169 on
Mt.com
by
Vito Mediavilla
Apr 24, 2018
Desktop
Listing
Vito Mediavilla Tested Pattern #37: List Or Grid View In Test #169 On Mt.com
Test #168 on
Akademiafotografii.p...
by
Grzegorz Jancewicz Tested Pattern #45: Benefit Bar In Test #168 On Akademiafotografii.p...
Test #156 on
Mt.com
by
Vito Mediavilla
Feb 25, 2018
Desktop
Listing
Vito Mediavilla Tested Pattern #60: Repeated Bottom Call To Action In Test #156 On Mt.com
This test duplicated two buttons at the bottom of the page. However, the site already contained floating buttons (from the header).
Test #143 on
Vivareal.com.br
by
Rodrigo Maués
Jan 14, 2018
Desktop
Listing
Rodrigo Maués Tested Pattern #56: Hover Button In Test #143 On Vivareal.com.br
Test #133 on
Bing.com
by
Ronny Kohavi
Dec 13, 2017
Desktop
Mobile
Listing
Ronny Kohavi Tested Pattern #43: Long Titles In Test #133 On Bing.com
In 2012 a Microsoft employee working on Bing had an idea about changing the way the search engine displayed ad headlines. Developing it wouldn’t require much effort—just a few days of an engineer’s time—but it was one of hundreds of ideas proposed, and the program managers deemed it a low priority. So it languished for more than six months, until an engineer, who saw that the cost of writing the code for it would be small, launched a simple online controlled experiment—an A/B test—to assess its impact. Within hours the new headline variation was producing abnormally high revenue, triggering a “too good to be true” alert.
HBR, September–October 2017 Issue, https://hbr.org/2017/09/the-surprising-power-of-online-experiments
Note: This experiment was a solid success and replicated multiple times over a period of months. It worked at Bing and had a profound influence. The only reason why we atributed a 0.25 point (a "Maybe") was because we don't have the exact sample size and conversion data.
Test #127 on
Glass.net
by
Mark Freedle
Nov 23, 2017
Desktop
Mobile
Listing
Mark Freedle Tested Pattern #42: Countdown Timer In Test #127 On Glass.net
Test #119 on
Vivareal.com.br
by
Rodrigo Maués
Nov 01, 2017
Desktop
Listing
Rodrigo Maués Tested Pattern #36: Fewer Or More Results In Test #119 On Vivareal.com.br
Test #120 on
Vivareal.com.br
by
Rodrigo Maués
Nov 01, 2017
Desktop
Listing
Rodrigo Maués Tested Pattern #37: List Or Grid View In Test #120 On Vivareal.com.br
Test #114 on
Akademiafotografii.p...
by
Grzegorz Jancewicz Tested Pattern #32: Condensed List In Test #114 On Akademiafotografii.p...
Test #113 on
Vivareal.com.br
by
Rodrigo Maués
Sep 01, 2017
Desktop
Listing
Rodrigo Maués Tested Pattern #31: Instant Filter Results In Test #113 On Vivareal.com.br
Test #97 on
3dhubs.com
by
Rob Draaijer
May 03, 2017
Desktop
Mobile
Listing
Rob Draaijer Tested Pattern #24: Visible Availability In Test #97 On 3dhubs.com
Test #91 on
3dhubs.com
by
Rob Draaijer
Jan 01, 2017
Desktop
Listing
Rob Draaijer Tested Pattern #9: Multiple Steps In Test #91 On 3dhubs.com
In this experiment, a long form with multiple steps was broken down into a progressive interaction form. In the B variant, as users would complete particular steps, new ones would be communicated subtly and finally come into full view.
Test #21 on
Findsomeone.co.nz
by
Daniel Bridges
Jan 01, 2016
Desktop
Mobile
Listing
Daniel Bridges Tested Pattern #25: Nagging Results In Test #21 On Findsomeone.co.nz
