All Latest 534 A/B Tests

Only Significant A/B Tests

Become a member to unlock the abiltiy to see the highest impact a/b tests. Being able to see the actual test results and sort by impact allows growth and experimentation teams to take action on the biggest gains first

MOST RECENT TESTS

Test #405 on Learnwithhomer.com by Stanley Zuo   Apr 07, 2022 Mobile Signup

Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #119: Unselected Or Selected Defaults In Test #405 On Learnwithhomer.com

In this experiment, the annual plan was preselected instead of starting off unselected in the control. Impact on two metrics was measured: any plan and annual plan purchases.

Test #399 on by Jakub Linowski   Feb 27, 2022 Desktop Mobile Checkout

Jakub Linowski Tested Pattern #35: Floating Labels In Test #399

In this experiment, top-aligned field labels were tested against floating labels (with labels floating inside the form field itself).

Test #393 on Snocks.com by Melina Hess   Jan 19, 2022 Mobile Shopping Cart

Melina Hess Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields In Test #393 On Snocks.com

This experiment replaced a visible coupon field with a dynamic text link that would initially hide the form field. Only after clicking the text link would the coupon form field appear. The translation from German is "Do you have a coupon code? Click here to apply". Impact on completed transactions was measured.

Test #389 on Svsound.com by Keenan Davis   Dec 16, 2021 Desktop Mobile Checkout

Keenan Davis Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields In Test #389 On Svsound.com

In this simple experiment, a highly visible coupon field was replaced with a less visible (but clickable) link in the variation. Clicking on the link would show the coupon field. Impact on sales and revenue was measured.

Test #383 on by Jakub Linowski   Nov 11, 2021 Desktop Checkout

Jakub Linowski Tested Pattern #123: Single Or Double Column Form Fields In Test #383

In this simple [inverted] experiment, the variation organized the form fields into a single column. The control had two columns of form fields.

Test #352 on Us.flukecal.com by John Hickey   May 11, 2021 Desktop Global

John Hickey Tested Pattern #123: Single Or Double Column Form Fields In Test #352 On Us.flukecal.com

In this experiment, single column (longer) form fields were tested against a two column layout (more compact).

Test #351 on Baremetrics.com by Brian Sierakowski   Apr 30, 2021 Desktop Mobile Home & Landing

Brian Sierakowski Tested Pattern #11: Gradual Reassurance In Test #351 On Baremetrics.com

In this experiment, static integration logos were replaced with selectable ones that reassured users to signup. After clicking an integration logo, a comparison chart would appear showing how Baremetrics improves upon a selected payment processor, along with a call to signup. Impact on signups was measured.

Test #345 on Getninjas.com.br by Rodolfo Lugli   Mar 29, 2021 Desktop Home & Landing

Rodolfo Lugli Tested Pattern #9: Multiple Steps In Test #345 On Getninjas.com.br

In this experiment, a single long form was broken into at least 3 steps. 

Test #86 on Vivareal.com.br by Rodrigo Maués   Feb 28, 2021 Mobile Desktop Product

Rodrigo Maués Tested Pattern #3: Fewer Form Fields In Test #86 On Vivareal.com.br

In this experiment, the telephone field was removed from a lead form on a property page. Impact on leads was measured.

Test #341 on by Alex James   Feb 25, 2021 Desktop Mobile Signup

Alex James Tested Pattern #35: Floating Labels In Test #341

This experiment shows a comparison between floating-field labels vs top-aligned labels. In the control, the form labels first appeared inline and as users would begin typing, they floated to the top of the field. The variation had fixed field labels above the form fields at all times. Impact on signups was measured.

Test #313 on Trydesignlab.com by Daniel Shapiro   Aug 19, 2020 Desktop Mobile Home & Landing

Daniel Shapiro Tested Pattern #11: Gradual Reassurance In Test #313 On Trydesignlab.com

In this experiment, instead of showing a single-focused lead form (for the UX Academy Program), users were asked to express a wider set of choices first (for the UX Academy or shortter set of skill-based courses). The experiment measured overall leads for both types of programs.

Test #312 on by Jakub Linowski   Aug 14, 2020 Desktop Mobile Product

Jakub Linowski Tested Pattern #83: Progressive Fields In Test #312

In this experiment, we tested a visible "Shipping Frequency" (A) option against a progressively displayed one (B) that would only appear after someone first chose a duration option. Thus in variation B, the buy box component would initially appear with fewer fields and smaller. The experiment measured initial progression and actual sales. 

Note on the data: the experiment was run a little shorter than usual, as one of the variations triggered a stop rule to protect losses (so the effect might be somewhat inflated from a lower power).

Test #309 on Thomasnet.com by Julian Gaviria   Jul 24, 2020 Desktop Listing

Julian Gaviria Tested Pattern #72: Priming Step In Test #309 On Thomasnet.com

In this experiment, an extra step was prepended at the beginning of a multiple step signup modal flow. The signup modal would appear on listing pages after requests to contact a listed company. The idea was to prime users with benefits of signing up in order to increase their motivation to do so. The experiment measured the impact on the initial progression (to the step with the email form).

Test #305 on Volders.de by Michal Fiech   Jun 30, 2020 Mobile Desktop Home & Landing

Michal Fiech Tested Pattern #94: Visible Search In Test #305 On Volders.de

In this experiment, a search input field (to look for companies) along with most popular links (also company names) were displayed on the homepage of a leading contract cancellation service. The control (A) version instead had a button that sent users to a next page where the same selection could be made - only later. The measurable success criteria were the number of paid cancellations - a few steps down the funnel.

Test #302 on Volders.de by Michal Fiech   Jun 09, 2020 Desktop Mobile Signup

Michal Fiech Tested Pattern #83: Progressive Fields In Test #302 On Volders.de

In this experiment a long form (A) was replaced with a progressive form interaction (B). Most of the form fields would appear in a grey-disabled style, until the prerequioste fields were first filled out.

Test #300 on Volders.de by Michal Fiech   May 25, 2020 Desktop Mobile Signup

Michal Fiech Tested Pattern #3: Fewer Form Fields In Test #300 On Volders.de

In this experiment, a password field was removed on a contract cancellation form (Volders).

In the control version, users were required to enter their email address and a password. If the email address was associated with an existing account, then the password was used to authenticate the user (and validated). When users entered a new email address, then the password field was used to create a new account. 

In the variation, the password field was removed, as the authentication happened after the conversion itself using other backend mechanisms.

 

Test #290 on Prepagent.com by Arthur Sparks   Mar 23, 2020 Desktop Pricing

Arthur Sparks Tested Pattern #14: Exposed Menu Options In Test #290 On Prepagent.com

In this experiment, a simple pulldown menu (for US state selection) was replaced with all state options shown as selectable buttons. The states were also abbreviated.

Test #286 on Volders.de by Alexander Krieger   Feb 28, 2020 Desktop Mobile Home & Landing

Alexander Krieger Tested Pattern #9: Multiple Steps In Test #286 On Volders.de

In this experiment, a long contract cancellation landing page (control) was broken down into 4 steps with 1 final summary step (variation).

Test #280 on Volders.de by Alexander Krieger   Jan 24, 2020 Desktop Mobile Signup

Alexander Krieger Tested Pattern #3: Fewer Form Fields In Test #280 On Volders.de

In this experiment on a contract cancellation funnel, one field was removed - a secondary contract ID. The control and variation both had a primary "customer ID" with which to identify and cancel someone's contract with.

Test #274 on by Someone   Dec 16, 2019 Desktop Mobile Checkout

Someone Tested Pattern #1: Remove Coupon Fields In Test #274

In this experiment, a fully visible coupon field (A) was made less visible by turning it into a default collaped link (B). Clicking on the link caused the coupon field to appear.