Tests | GoodUI

Test #137 on Trydesignlab.com by Daniel Shapiro Dec 22, 2017 Desktop Mobile Checkout

Daniel Shapiro Tested Pattern #46: Pay Later In Test #137 On Trydesignlab.com

This test was run on a 3 step checkout process. The first screen was asking for contact information, and the second screen asked for credit card details. The change was shown on both first two steps as shown on the image below.

Test #138 on Trydesignlab.com by Daniel Shapiro Dec 22, 2017 Desktop Mobile Checkout

Daniel Shapiro Tested Pattern #42: Countdown Timer In Test #138 On Trydesignlab.com

This test was run on a 3 step checkout process. The first screen was asking for contact information, and the second screen asked for credit card details. The change was shown on both first two steps as shown on the image below.

Test #136 on Missetam.nl by Marlies Wilms Floet Dec 18, 2017 Desktop Product

Marlies Wilms Floet Tested Pattern #42: Countdown Timer In Test #136 On Missetam.nl

De Nieuwe Zaak (a Dutch ecommerce agency) tested a countdown timer on an ecommerce site. The variation showed how many hours and minutes were left in order to be eligible for next day delivery. The variation beat the control which did not have this element of urgency.

Test #134 on Kenhub.com by Niels Hapke Dec 14, 2017 Desktop Product

Niels Hapke Tested Pattern #41: Sticky Call To Action In Test #134 On Kenhub.com

In this beautiful test, the key change was the introduction of a larger call to action linking to a premium / upgrade screen. The call to action was placed on the left sidebar which was floating. This is a great example of providing visibility to important elements by making them persistent.

Test #130 on Kenhub.com by Niels Hapke Dec 07, 2017 Desktop Pricing

Niels Hapke Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #130 On Kenhub.com

In this experiment, the plans were sorted by the most expensive first, left to right (variation).

Test #117 on Ssdnodes.com by Matt Connor Oct 02, 2017 Desktop Shopping Cart

Matt Connor Tested Pattern #21: What It's Worth In Test #117 On Ssdnodes.com

Test #93 on Examine.com by Martin Wong Aug 01, 2017 Desktop Home & Landing

Martin Wong Tested Pattern #29: Surfaced Content In Test #93 On Examine.com

Test #89 on Ssdnodes.com by Matt Connor Jun 01, 2017 Desktop Mobile Checkout

Matt Connor Tested Pattern #4: Testimonials In Test #89 On Ssdnodes.com

Test #106 on Examine.com by Martin Wong May 23, 2017 Desktop Product

Martin Wong Tested Pattern #15: Bulleted Reassurances In Test #106 On Examine.com

Three reassurances were added underneath each purchase button: Lifetime Updates, Works On All Devices and Money-Back Guarantee.

Test #107 on Examine.com by Martin Wong May 22, 2017 Desktop Product

Martin Wong Tested Pattern #14: Exposed Menu Options In Test #107 On Examine.com

Test #83 on Onlinefaxes.com by Jaymie Friesen Mar 02, 2017 Desktop Home & Landing

Jaymie Friesen Tested Pattern #4: Testimonials In Test #83 On Onlinefaxes.com

Test #84 on Onlinefaxes.com by Jaymie Friesen Mar 02, 2017 Desktop Mobile Home & Landing

Jaymie Friesen Tested Pattern #7: Social Counts In Test #84 On Onlinefaxes.com

Test #79 on by Chris Goward Jan 10, 2017 Desktop Product

Chris Goward Tested Pattern #15: Bulleted Reassurances In Test #79

Test #66 on Telestream.net by Chris Goward Nov 01, 2016 Shopping Cart

Chris Goward Tested Pattern #9: Multiple Steps In Test #66 On Telestream.net

Telestream specializes in software that make it possible to get video content to any audience regardless of how it is created, distributed, or viewed. Telestream’s customer acquisition strategy is centered around driving traffic to their website to trial, or to purchase from their online store. Shoppers can buy software online, download it right away, and immediately start using it. The variation was designed with the same information as the control except spread across 4 steps (instead of 3). The rationale was that each step would be shorter and less overwhelming for the user.

Test #70 on Uptowork.com by Kuba Koziej Nov 01, 2016 Desktop Pricing

Kuba Koziej Tested Pattern #17: Least Or Most Expensive First In Test #70 On Uptowork.com

This test simply ordered the pricing plans from highest to most expensive. Overall sales decreased by an insignificant -1% with a possible +14% increase to the most expensive plan. The net effect was an insignificant 0.9% increase the the premium plans.

Test #51 on Menufy.com by Aleksandr Elesev Oct 20, 2016 Desktop Mobile Checkout

Your filter results