All Latest 498 A/B Tests

In this desktop experiment, 4 product tiles per page (control) were tested against 6. Impact on sales was measured.

In this experiment, a two column grid layout (control) was tested against single column layout (variation) with the product information shown to the right. Please note that the screenshot shows repeated products only because it's been sourced from a Figma design file. In reality, the products in the variation were equally diverse as in the control. 

(We've also flipped the A and B to match up with our grid pattern.)

In this experiment, instead of showing 12 products per screen (with pagination), the variation showed all 42 products on a single screen. Impact on adds to cart and completed orders was measured.

Are more (popular) product results better than none at all? In this experiment, popular products were shown during an empty search result. Impact on sales was measured.

In this experiment, a right side form shifted in position to the left. Impact on leads was measured.

In this experiment, the footer was simplified with multiple elements being removed (catalog request, secondary links, and a guarantee). Additionally, a more prominent phone number was also displayed.

In this shopping cart experiment, a tall footer was completely removed. The footer contained elements such as: app download links, a newsletter signup, secondary web site links, trust symbols, social media icons and company contant information. Impact on sales was measured.

In this experiment, pricing plans were laid out horizontally for easier comparison. In the variation, most of the plan benefits, features and differences were also referenced using a single lable that was left-aligned. The idea was to make the variables aligned and therefore more comparable.

This pricing table appeared at the bottom of a long design program landing page. Impact on leads and applications was measured.

Here the experiment contained a layout change. Standard content components with varied heights were tested against sections with false bottoms. That is the conntent blocks in the variation took up 100% height of the viewport. This change was also applied throughout the rest of the content blocks. Impact on overall signup rates was measured.

In this experiment, paragraph style copy was reorganized into a zig zag layout with key sections being reinforiced with copy-as-image statements. Impact on adds-to-cart and sales was measured.

In this simple [inverted] experiment, the variation organized the form fields into a single column. The control had two columns of form fields.

In this experiment, product descriptions were changed to an alternating zig zag layout with images. Impact on adds-to-cart and sales was measured.

In this experiment, the header section of the homepage drastically focused around the call to action. This was done by removing elements and forcing a false bottom.

This experiment challanged a right aligned detail page. After clicking a result of a job role on a listing page, an overlay would appear on the right with the details. The variation used a full width screen instead - effectively centering the page.

In this experiment, single column (longer) form fields were tested against a two column layout (more compact).

In this experiment, a lead generating section with a call to action (welcome mat) was appended at the top of article pages. Impact on lead generation was measured.

In this experiment, the content on a product page was reorganized into a zigzagging (alternating layout) along with reinforcing photos. Impact on adds-to-cart and total sales was measured.

In this experiment, plan properties on a pricing page were horizontally aligned (for easier comparison). More so, labels and values were also broken on separate lines.

In this experiment, side-by-side plan features were aligned and changed to a comparison table with checkmarks for easier comparison.

In this experiment, a list view was tested against a grid view.