All Latest 634 A/B Tests

In this experiment, listing descriptions were shortened dynamically using exposable "more" links. This way, the variation showed shorter listings and therefore more listings per screens. Impact on listing clicks (progression) along with membership starts was measured.

In this experiment, product descriptions were changed to an alternating zig zag layout with images. Impact on adds-to-cart and sales was measured.

In this experimemt, the number of service requests per month were shown that people can expect after signing up in a given category. Impact on leads was measured (people who would be signing up to offer a particular service).

In this experiment, the interaction on a product page was changed. In the control (A), after clicking "add to cart", the customer would remain on the product page with an updated basket and the button changing to "Go To Cart". The variation (B) however took customers forward automatically to the cart.

In this experiment, a pricing plan selector was shifted from the very bottom of a long product page towards (almost) the top. Impact on any transactions or sales was measured.

In this experiment, the header section of the homepage drastically focused around the call to action. This was done by removing elements and forcing a false bottom.

In this experiment, a single focus signup was transformed into a pricing comparison table. Impact on signups was measured.

In this experiment, an extra product choice was added to the header of a homepage. Instead of only highlighting a set of four specific products, the option to build custom variety one, was added.

This experiment challanged a right aligned detail page. After clicking a result of a job role on a listing page, an overlay would appear on the right with the details. The variation used a full width screen instead - effectively centering the page.

In this experiment, single column (longer) form fields were tested against a two column layout (more compact).

In this experiment, static integration logos were replaced with selectable ones that reassured users to signup. After clicking an integration logo, a comparison chart would appear showing how Baremetrics improves upon a selected payment processor, along with a call to signup. Impact on signups was measured.

In this simple experiment, the size of the "Get Quote" button in the top navigation was increased. 

In this experiment, when customers viewed a product and returned to the homepage, they would then see the most recently viewed one - a delicate nudge. The experiment ran with full traffic and impact on sales was measured.

This experiment attempted to increase the number of leads on a lead-funnel. As the first step, users were being asked to upload a file. The control showed the file types that were allowed, whereas the variation changed the copy to show a number of benefits for taking that action. The text-based benefits included the: receiving feedback, prices and lead times.

In this experiment, a single long form was broken into at least 3 steps. 

In this experiment, the content on a product page was reorganized into a zigzagging (alternating layout) along with reinforcing photos. Impact on adds-to-cart and total sales was measured.

In this experiment, a registration wall was added on a listing page of casting call profiles. The registration wall appeared after the first 9 listings or so and encouraged users to sign up. Impact on registrations was measured, along with an engagement metric of "posting a job".

This experiment shows a comparison between floating-field labels vs top-aligned labels. Form labels first appeared inline and as users would begin typing, they floated to the top of the field. In the other version, fixed field labels were shown above the form fields at all times. Impact on signups was measured.

In this experiment, a listing page was expanded to show two actions (apply and view details) instead of a single one (view details only). In the variant, the "view detail" links were replaced with "apply links" starting a job application (and membership flows) sooner. 

In this experiment, the variation broke up a lead form into two parts. In the first step users were asked for their state followed by a standard contact form on a second step. All of the states were shown as selectable options. In the control version, the landing page only showed a button which lead to the full form. The experiment measured impact on lead form submissions.