All Latest 620 A/B Tests

In this experiment, realtime social proof information has been added below an add-to-cart button. The variation shows how many users that have viewed, or placed a product into their basket. Translated to "4 visitors have this product in their shopping cart."

In this experiment, structured data tags were displayed on a listing page to help potential buyers make better decisions. The additional information about the listed companies included: annual revenue, employee count, and year of establishment.

In this experiment, a contact button was added to a listing / search results page to make it faster to contact a company. This same button was also visible on the company detail page.

In this experiment, multiple view detail links for a listing tile were turned into higher contrast buttons. 

In this experiment on a contract cancellation funnel, one field was removed - a secondary contract ID. The control and variation both had a primary "customer ID" with which to identify and cancel someone's contract with.

In this experiment, 3 additional course links with descriptions were added to the homepage. The idea was to increase course sales aside of the Saas subscription signups.

In this experiment, multiple elemenets were removed from the bottom of the cart page. This was done to see if they were potential distractions that hindered the purchase process. The elements included such things as: Order details (visible on other pages), large product photo, a "what you receive" section with selling points, more reassurances, and a newsletter subscribe box.

In this experiment, a list view was tested against a grid view.

In this experiment, the variation exposed 6 of the options from the pulldown menu as tabs.

The change in this experiment was an exposed SEO panel (B) with a number of clickable filter options. 

A "Step X of 4" progress bar was tested against a fully visible one that was also clickable.

In this experiment, a product page showed customer reviews at the bottom of the page (B) instead of hiding them under a tab (A).

In this experiment users saw a sticky bar advertising the benefits of a Premium account across the bottom of the website, wherever they navigate. The sticky call to action appeared with a 4 second delay and was floating.

In this experiment, the B version condensed the company listings. This was done by showing less of the description and introducing a "more" and "less" dynamic links that would expand and collapse the description.

In this experiment on Valk Exclusief's web site, a reason was provided for why the e-mail address is being collected. Google translation of the added text is as follows: "If your e-mail address is not yet known to us, we will ask you to add some missing information. Then you immediately benefit from our benefits such as the ValkLoyal savings program."

In this experiment only the button label changed. The control had a more immediate (next step-oriented) button label of "Upload Your Photos Now". The variation tried a more benefit-oriented button of "Order Now" (hinting at paying and obtaining the product).

In this experiment, the navigation label was changed from "Network" to "Find Suppliers". The idea was to make use of an action label with a clearer benefit.

A product landing page with an image was tested against one without - raising the call to action above the fold.

In this experiment, full red background buttons were changed to ghost buttons (red outline and transparent fill)

A contract cancellation landing page was tested for the effect of a single (wider CTA area with a left aligned button) vs two column layout (narrow CTA area with a right aligned button).