All Latest 644 A/B Tests

MOST RECENT TESTS

Test #99 on Vivareal.com.br by Rodrigo MauésRodrigo Maués Sep 23, 2020 Desktop Mobile Product X.X% Leads

Rodrigo Tested Pattern #24: Visible Availability On Vivareal.com.br

Pattern #24: Visible Availability - Variant A
Pattern #24: Visible Availability - Variant B

In this experiment, a lead form on a listing page showed whether an agent was recently online or not. The diplayed had two statuses: either indicating that someone is online now, or the most recent time they were online in minutes.

Total Sample: 249,954 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 88.6%

Which A Or B Actually Wins? Find Out Before You Test.

Members see every test result — the winners, the flat ones, and the losers — along with exact effects and sample sizes. Use it to estimate your tests and prioritize by probability, not gut feel. Start every experiment with the odds on your side.

Test #314 on Zapimoveis.com.br by Vinicius Barros PeixotoVinicius Barros Peixoto Aug 21, 2020 Desktop Mobile Product X.X% Leads

Vinicius Tested Pattern #43: Long Titles On Zapimoveis.com.br

Pattern #43: Long Titles - Variant A
Pattern #43: Long Titles - Variant B

In this experiment, a dynamic page title was generated and added at the top of the screen. The first few words from a property description were used to dynamically generate these titles. The effect on leads was measured.

Total Sample: 6,533,516 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 99.9%

Test #313 on Trydesignlab.com by Daniel ShapiroDaniel Shapiro Aug 19, 2020 Desktop Mobile Home & Landing X.X% Leads

Daniel Tested Pattern #11: Gradual Reassurance On Trydesignlab.com

Pattern #11: Gradual Reassurance - Variant A
Pattern #11: Gradual Reassurance - Variant B

In this experiment, instead of showing a single-focused lead form (for the UX Academy Program), users were asked to express a wider set of choices first (for the UX Academy or shortter set of skill-based courses). The experiment measured overall leads for both types of programs.

Total Sample: 13,231 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 15.7%

Test #312 by Jakub LinowskiJakub Linowski Aug 14, 2020 Desktop Mobile Product X.X% Sales

Jakub Tested Pattern #83: Progressive Fields

Pattern #83: Progressive Fields - Variant A
Pattern #83: Progressive Fields - Variant B

In this experiment, we tested a visible "Shipping Frequency" (A) option against a progressively displayed one (B) that would only appear after someone first chose a duration option. Thus in variation B, the buy box component would initially appear with fewer fields and smaller. The experiment measured initial progression and actual sales. 

Note on the data: the experiment was run a little shorter than usual, as one of the variations triggered a stop rule to protect losses (so the effect might be somewhat inflated from a lower power).

Total Sample: 2,861 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 5.6%

Test #311 on Backstage.com by Stanley ZuoStanley Zuo Aug 11, 2020 Desktop Mobile Home & Landing X.X% Sales

Stanley Tested Pattern #118: Category Images On Backstage.com

Pattern #118: Category Images - Variant A
Pattern #118: Category Images - Variant B

In this experiment, category links (linking to casting call search results) were replaced with tile images. In addition, 2 levels of categories were also replaced with a single text link for each tile. Finally, the font size of the link titles was also increased.

Total Sample: 120,519 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 19.7%

Test #309 on Thomasnet.com by Julian GaviriaJulian Gaviria Jul 24, 2020 Desktop Listing X.X% Progression

Julian Tested Pattern #72: Priming Step On Thomasnet.com

Pattern #72: Priming Step - Variant A
Pattern #72: Priming Step - Variant B

In this experiment, an extra step was prepended at the beginning of a multiple step signup modal flow. The signup modal would appear on listing pages after requests to contact a listed company. The idea was to prime users with benefits of signing up in order to increase their motivation to do so. The experiment measured the impact on the initial progression (to the step with the email form).

Total Sample: 6,146 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 12.5%

Test #308 on Umbraco.com by Lars Skjold IversenLars Skjold Iversen Jul 23, 2020 Desktop Home & Landing X.X% Signups

Lars Tested Pattern #4: Testimonials On Umbraco.com

Pattern #4: Testimonials - Variant A
Pattern #4: Testimonials - Variant B

In this experiment, three testimonials were added mid way though on a CMS landing page. At the end of the customer testimonials an additional trial signup button was also added - which was also the primary metric. 

Total Sample: 107,783 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 12.1%

Test #307 on Volders.de by Michal FiechMichal Fiech Jul 17, 2020 Desktop Thank You X.X% Progression

Michal Tested Pattern #77: Filled Or Ghost Buttons On Volders.de

Pattern #77: Filled Or Ghost Buttons - Variant A
Pattern #77: Filled Or Ghost Buttons - Variant B

This experiment measured a shallow click goal on a button that would encourage to repeated the action that was just completed (in this case a contract cancellation). In the control version (A) a thank-you screen shows a filled button style, and the variant (B) there was a ghost button. As a note, I also flipped the A-B in this experiment for the purpose of matching it to our ghost button pattern, which means that Volders in fact was starting  out with a ghost button to begin with. 

Total Sample: 53,618 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 41.7%

Test #306 on Backstage.com by Stanley ZuoStanley Zuo Jul 09, 2020 Desktop Mobile Pricing X.X% Sales

Stanley Tested Pattern #69: Autodiscounting On Backstage.com

Pattern #69: Autodiscounting - Variant A
Pattern #69: Autodiscounting - Variant B

In this experiment, the only change was an added message at the top of the pricing screen, clarifying that there is an active discount on a yearly plan. The discount was already communicated with a strike-through price on the control version as well. The variation simply emphasized this aggressively. 

Total Sample: 15,106 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 17.8%

Test #305 on Volders.de by Michal FiechMichal Fiech Jun 30, 2020 Mobile Desktop Home & Landing X.X% Sales

Michal Tested Pattern #94: Visible Search On Volders.de

Pattern #94: Visible Search - Variant A
Pattern #94: Visible Search - Variant B

In this experiment, a search input field (to look for companies) along with most popular links (also company names) were displayed on the homepage of a leading contract cancellation service. The control (A) version instead had a button that sent users to a next page where the same selection could be made - only later. The measurable success criteria were the number of paid cancellations - a few steps down the funnel.

Total Sample: 10,350 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 10.6%

Test #303 on Thomasnet.com by Julian GaviriaJulian Gaviria Jun 26, 2020 Desktop Mobile Global X.X% Leads

Julian Tested Pattern #14: Exposed Menu Options On Thomasnet.com

Pattern #14: Exposed Menu Options - Variant A
Pattern #14: Exposed Menu Options - Variant B

In this experiment variation, the saved suppliers feature was surfaced in the global navigation.It was already possible to save supplier companies from listing and specific company pages. This experiment aimed to increase the saving functions visibility and possibly increase more leads. 

Total Sample: 3,326,087 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 62.5%

Test #61 by Someone Someone Jun 26, 2020 Desktop Checkout X.X% Sales

Someone Tested Pattern #9: Multiple Steps

Pattern #9: Multiple Steps - Variant A
Pattern #9: Multiple Steps - Variant B

In this experiment, a single screen checkout was turned into a series of smaller steps in variation B. This was achieved by showing fewer fields on the first step, and shifting the remaining ones into a 3 step modal popup. The experiment measured successful transactions (sales).

Total Sample: 8,886 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 11.1%

Test #302 on Volders.de by Michal FiechMichal Fiech Jun 09, 2020 Desktop Mobile Signup X.X% Sales

Michal Tested Pattern #83: Progressive Fields On Volders.de

Pattern #83: Progressive Fields - Variant A
Pattern #83: Progressive Fields - Variant B

In this experiment a long form (A) was replaced with a progressive form interaction (B). Most of the form fields would appear in a grey-disabled style, until the prerequioste fields were first filled out.

Total Sample: 35,884 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 51.2%

Test #301 on Zapimoveis.com.br by Vinicius Barros PeixotoVinicius Barros Peixoto May 31, 2020 Desktop Mobile Product X.X% Leads

Vinicius Tested Pattern #21: What It's Worth On Zapimoveis.com.br

Pattern #21: What It's Worth - Variant A
Pattern #21: What It's Worth - Variant B

In this experiment, the B variation property prices were framed using higher and crossed out price points from 12 months ago - achieving a relative discount. A tooltip was also shown which explained the higher price point on hover. The example in the screenshot translates to "2% less compared to 12 months ago". This high-power experiment measured the number of leads that were generated on property (product) screens.

Total Sample: 136,682 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 97.6%

Test #300 on Volders.de by Michal FiechMichal Fiech May 25, 2020 Desktop Mobile Signup X.X% Progression

Michal Tested Pattern #3: Fewer Form Fields On Volders.de

Pattern #3: Fewer Form Fields - Variant A
Pattern #3: Fewer Form Fields - Variant B

In this experiment, a password field was removed on a contract cancellation form (Volders).

In the control version, users were required to enter their email address and a password. If the email address was associated with an existing account, then the password was used to authenticate the user (and validated). When users entered a new email address, then the password field was used to create a new account. 

In the variation, the password field was removed, as the authentication happened after the conversion itself using other backend mechanisms.

 

Total Sample: 23,356 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 83.8%

Test #299 on Backstage.com by Stanley ZuoStanley Zuo May 22, 2020 Desktop Mobile Listing X.X% Sales

Stanley Tested Pattern #60: Repeated Bottom Call To Action On Backstage.com

Pattern #60: Repeated Bottom Call To Action - Variant A
Pattern #60: Repeated Bottom Call To Action - Variant B

In this experiment, at the bottom of a search results screen, a membership join button was added along with 3 encouraging reasons. The experiment measured membership funnel starts, as well as paid membership transactions (sales).

Total Sample: 106,791 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 12.2%

Test #298 on Zapimoveis.com.br by Vinicius Barros PeixotoVinicius Barros Peixoto May 14, 2020 Desktop Mobile Listing X.X% Leads

Vinicius Tested Pattern #36: Fewer Or More Results On Zapimoveis.com.br

Pattern #36: Fewer Or More Results - Variant A
Pattern #36: Fewer Or More Results - Variant B

In this experiment on a listing page, the search was expanded to show more listings (variation B). Conditionally, if there were fewer than 36 results, set basic filters such as number bedrooms and bathrooms were expanded and appended to the results. Hence if someone chose 2 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms in variation A, they would only see listing with that filter. In variation B however they would first see the filtered results, and later they would also see results with 3 or more of each. 

Total Sample: 1,907,053 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 99.9%

Test #297 on Trydesignlab.com by Daniel ShapiroDaniel Shapiro May 04, 2020 Desktop Home & Landing X.X% Sales

Daniel Tested Pattern #41: Sticky Call To Action On Trydesignlab.com

Pattern #41: Sticky Call To Action - Variant A
Pattern #41: Sticky Call To Action - Variant B

In this experiment, a sticky "Enroll" button was shown on a course landing page. The button lead to a payment funnel to allow enrolling/paying for a course. The exeperiment measured inital progression into this funnel as well as the deeper completed sales metric.

Total Sample: 19,954 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 9.2%

Test #295 on Thomasnet.com by Julian GaviriaJulian Gaviria Apr 29, 2020 Desktop Mobile Content X.X% Engagement

Julian Tested Pattern #25: Nagging Results On Thomasnet.com

Pattern #25: Nagging Results - Variant A
Pattern #25: Nagging Results - Variant B

In this experiment, blog article pages were hidden behind a registration wall - requing a signup to access. The registration wall would appear after the first paragraph using gradual opacity to cover the rest of the article. We have published the effects of this change on registrations (signups) and on engagement (users viewing other more important company detail pages).

Total Sample: 131,642 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 26.7%

Test #294 on Umbraco.com by Lars Skjold IversenLars Skjold Iversen Apr 23, 2020 Desktop Pricing X.X% Progression

Lars Tested Pattern #115: Pricing Comparison Table On Umbraco.com

Pattern #115: Pricing Comparison Table - Variant A
Pattern #115: Pricing Comparison Table - Variant B

In this experiment, plan properties on a pricing page were horizontally aligned (for easier comparison). More so, labels and values were also broken on separate lines.

Total Sample: 18,623 • Statistical Power at 5% MDE: 5.3%