All Latest 607 A/B Tests

In this experiment, the $69 payment was explained as $6 per month over 1 year, and the $89 was explained as $4 per month over 2 years. 

In this experiment users saw a sticky bar advertising the benefits of a Premium account across the bottom of the website, wherever they navigate. The sticky call to action appeared with a 4 second delay and was floating.

In this experiment a different headline was tested. "Reach Higher Conversions Faster" vs. "Learn From What We Try And Test".

In this experiment, the B version condensed the company listings. This was done by showing less of the description and introducing a "more" and "less" dynamic links that would expand and collapse the description.

In this experiment, onhover tooltip explanations were added to selected fields (Firstname, Lastname, Phone, Email and Password). One translation example of the Firstname tooltip was the following "Enter your first name (or letter) so that we can address you in a more personal way".

In this experiment on Valk Exclusief's web site, a reason was provided for why the e-mail address is being collected. Google translation of the added text is as follows: "If your e-mail address is not yet known to us, we will ask you to add some missing information. Then you immediately benefit from our benefits such as the ValkLoyal savings program."

In this experiment on Valk Exclusief's web site, a transparent overview of the benefits for booking hotels was shown. The copy translates to: "Why should you book here? - 5€ Loyalty Discount - Best Price Guarantee - Discount On Packages - No Reservation Costs. Valk is a 150 year hotel chain in the Netherlands.

In this variation an optional field label was added.

In this followup experiment, field labels without and with a marked asterisk were tested.

The original had no fields marked as required. The variant had all fields marked as required with an asterisk (and a reference note).

In this experiment, field labels without and with a marked asterisk were tested.

In this experiment, 4 things were adjusted in the variation: the highest pricing plan was shifted to the left, it was set as the default one, the recommendation was also adjusted to point to the highest plan, and one benefit from the lowest plan was removed (customer support).

In this experiment only the button label changed. The control had a more immediate (next step-oriented) button label of "Upload Your Photos Now". The variation tried a more benefit-oriented button of "Order Now" (hinting at paying and obtaining the product).

In this experiment, two pricing plans were inverted to show the most expensive plan first (in the variation).

In this experiment a light blue bold link was tested against a darker blue bold link. 

In this experiment, we tested a standard modal (with 2 choices) against a "Maybe Later" one (with 3 choices). One of the choices in the variant allowed users to postpone their decision with a "maybe" which would enable a floating bar at the bottom of the screen. Clicking on any of the "Yes" options would send people to the bottom of the screen with an email signup form. Increasing signup was our primary measure. Both modals also appeared instantly after a page load.

In this experiment, a version without a back button was tested against a one where it was positioned in the upper left corner. This test occured on a second step of a contract cancellation service.

AutoScout24 is Europe’s largest online marketplace for new and used cars. As published by Optimizely, they tested a form pre-filled with text that read: ‘Hello. I am interested in your vehicle. Please contact me. Kind regards.’ 

In this experiment, an editable contract cancellation letter was tested against a non-editable one. The editable letter first appeared in a text state, which required a click on a link in order for it to be transformed into an editable textarea field.