All Latest 490 A/B Tests
Become a member to unlock the abiltiy to see the highest impact a/b tests. Being able to see the actual test results and sort by impact allows growth and experimentation teams to take action on the biggest gains first
MOST RECENT TESTS
Michal Fiech Tested Pattern #77: Filled Or Ghost Buttons In Test #307 On Volders.de
This experiment measured a shallow click goal on a button that would encourage to repeated the action that was just completed (in this case a contract cancellation). In the control version (A) a thank-you screen shows a filled button style, and the variant (B) there was a ghost button. As a note, I also flipped the A-B in this experiment for the purpose of matching it to our ghost button pattern, which means that Volders in fact was starting out with a ghost button to begin with.
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #69: Autodiscounting In Test #306 On Backstage.com
In this experiment, the only change was an added message at the top of the pricing screen, clarifying that there is an active discount on a yearly plan. The discount was already communicated with a strike-through price on the control version as well. The variation simply emphasized this aggressively.
Michal Fiech Tested Pattern #94: Visible Search In Test #305 On Volders.de
In this experiment, a search input field (to look for companies) along with most popular links (also company names) were displayed on the homepage of a leading contract cancellation service. The control (A) version instead had a button that sent users to a next page where the same selection could be made - only later. The measurable success criteria were the number of paid cancellations - a few steps down the funnel.
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #97: Bigger Form Fields In Test #304 On Backstage.com
In this experiment, larger "Apply" buttons were shown on a casting detail page. The application funnel would take users through a series of steps leading to a paid membership subscription. The experiment measured initial progression and account signups (email signups).
Julian Gaviria Tested Pattern #14: Exposed Menu Options In Test #303 On Thomasnet.com
In this experiment variation, the saved suppliers feature was surfaced in the global navigation.It was already possible to save supplier companies from listing and specific company pages. This experiment aimed to increase the saving functions visibility and possibly increase more leads.
Someone Tested Pattern #9: Multiple Steps In Test #61
In this experiment, a single screen checkout was turned into a series of smaller steps in variation B. This was achieved by showing fewer fields on the first step, and shifting the remaining ones into a 3 step modal popup. The experiment measured successful transactions (sales).
Michal Fiech Tested Pattern #83: Progressive Fields In Test #302 On Volders.de
In this experiment a long form (A) was replaced with a progressive form interaction (B). Most of the form fields would appear in a grey-disabled style, until the prerequioste fields were first filled out.
Vinicius Barros Peixoto Tested Pattern #21: What It's Worth In Test #301 On Zapimoveis.com.br
In this experiment, the B variation property prices were framed using higher and crossed out price points from 12 months ago - achieving a relative discount. A tooltip was also shown which explained the higher price point on hover. The example in the screenshot translates to "2% less compared to 12 months ago". This high-power experiment measured the number of leads that were generated on property (product) screens.
Michal Fiech Tested Pattern #3: Fewer Form Fields In Test #300 On Volders.de
In this experiment, a password field was removed on a contract cancellation form (Volders).
In the control version, users were required to enter their email address and a password. If the email address was associated with an existing account, then the password was used to authenticate the user (and validated). When users entered a new email address, then the password field was used to create a new account.
In the variation, the password field was removed, as the authentication happened after the conversion itself using other backend mechanisms.
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #60: Repeated Bottom Call To Action In Test #299 On Backstage.com
In this experiment, at the bottom of a search results screen, a membership join button was added along with 3 encouraging reasons. The experiment measured membership funnel starts, as well as paid membership transactions (sales).
Vinicius Barros Peixoto Tested Pattern #36: Fewer Or More Results In Test #298 On Zapimoveis.com.br
In this experiment on a listing page, the search was expanded to show more listings (variation B). Conditionally, if there were fewer than 36 results, set basic filters such as number bedrooms and bathrooms were expanded and appended to the results. Hence if someone chose 2 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms in variation A, they would only see listing with that filter. In variation B however they would first see the filtered results, and later they would also see results with 3 or more of each.
Daniel Shapiro Tested Pattern #41: Sticky Call To Action In Test #297 On Trydesignlab.com
In this experiment, a sticky "Enroll" button was shown on a course landing page. The button lead to a payment funnel to allow enrolling/paying for a course. The exeperiment measured inital progression into this funnel as well as the deeper completed sales metric.
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #23: Inline Link Nudge In Test #296 On Backstage.com
In this simple experiment, a text link to a join page was injected on an article page. The hypothesis was that more users would signup as a result of this subtle trigger.
Julian Gaviria Tested Pattern #25: Nagging Results In Test #295 On Thomasnet.com
In this experiment, blog article pages were hidden behind a registration wall - requing a signup to access. The registration wall would appear after the first paragraph using gradual opacity to cover the rest of the article. We have published the effects of this change on registrations (signups) and on engagement (users viewing other more important company detail pages).
Lars Skjold Iversen Tested Pattern #115: Pricing Comparison Table In Test #294 On Umbraco.com
In this experiment, plan properties on a pricing page were horizontally aligned (for easier comparison). More so, labels and values were also broken on separate lines.
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #114: Less Or More Visible Prices In Test #293 On Backstage.com
In this experiment on a casting call site, pricing information was shown beside the application button. This change shows the effect of setting a price expectation and being more clear that the application process is not free.
Stanley Zuo Tested Pattern #24: Visible Availability In Test #292 On Backstage.com
The core hypothesis of this experiment was that by showing clear availabiltiy (in green text) beside each casting call, more users would apply and become premium members. The experiment reports on two metrics: application starts (the first progression metric), and premium membership sales (merasured a few steps further in the funnel).
Jesse Germinario Tested Pattern #91: Forced Action In Test #291
This experiment was ran on the initial onboarding screens of the Elevate App - right after installing and launching the app for the first time. The change was the removal of subtle "skip" links that fast tracked users to the signup/login screen (Get Started). Hence in the variation, all users had to scroll through the 4 introductory messages before being asked to create an account.
Arthur Sparks Tested Pattern #17: Expensive First In Test #289 On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, the order of pricing plans was rearranged as to show the most expensive one first.
Arthur Sparks Tested Pattern #14: Exposed Menu Options In Test #290 On Prepagent.com
In this experiment, a simple pulldown menu (for US state selection) was replaced with all state options shown as selectable buttons. The states were also abbreviated.